Does Israel Have a Future?
Let’s start with this image of the Pentagon being attacked on 9/11:
The object in the bottom left corner of this video is what struck the Pentagon. Now if you think this wingless cylindrical object is a Boeing 757, you must be having eye trouble. It is obviously a missile which, if true, automatically means there was a conspiracy. Soldiers who arrived on that day carried weapons that they were told (bizarrely for a terrorist attack) should not be loaded. And as they sifted through the wreckage, they found ZERO evidence of a plane crash. Elements of a plane that are nearly indestructible, such as the titanium engine and the landing gear, were nowhere to be seen. No fuselage, no dead bodies, no wing fin. Nothing. And the hole, furthermore, was nowhere near the dimensions of a jumbo jet.
So we have a conspiracy, then. An actual one. Not “conspiracy theory” as some sort of fringe idea, but a real one.
And this would have to have been a conspiracy between Mossad and the CIA to create a false flag event that would be large enough and scary enough to mobilize the US population to support an invasion of the Middle East, not just to get control of Iraq’s oil, but to help establish Israeli hegemony in the Middle East. It is almost unbelievable that the intelligence agency of the US would be sadistic enough to kill over 3000 of its own people.
But hey, you gotta make sacrifices, right?
The CIA has been murdering people for decades. Their creation in 1953 of the MKUltra program to brainwash and torture selected victims to pull off assassinations and then subsequently not remember them was wildly successful. Lee Harvey Oswald, as everyone by now knows, was a CIA operative who had to play the patsy. There’s always a patsy in the assassinations and murders of the CIA.
Charles Manson, as it turns out, (in Tom O’Neill’s book Chaos) had gotten the MKUltra treatment and was sent in 1968, with his girls, to commit the heinous murder of Sharon Tate. The reason? LBJ wanted to turn public sentiment of hippies as peaceful love children into an image of horror and repugnance in order to ramp up support for Vietnam.
James Earl Ray, who assassinated Martin Luther King; Sirhan Sirhan, who assassinated Robert Kennedy and claimed to have no memory of doing so; Osama bin Laden; even Thomas Matthew Crooks, the shooter who attempted to kill Donald Trump, had evident ties with Intelligence; and most likely, Tyler Robinson, who “killed” Charlie Kirk; all of them were unwitting patsies. The CIA paradigm is always the same: scapegoat ONE guy, get rid of him, and the public moves on. Nothing to see here, folks.
It is well known, as Tucker Carlson has demonstrated in his 911 documentary, that the hi-jackers were carefully followed and mapped as they moved across the United States. There was no intelligence failure. These guys were all recruited by the CIA and made to believe they were committing a heroic deed in the name of Islam.
As the aviation captain Dan Hanley points out, the planes were likely remote controlled. There exists a program called the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot that can be used to take control of a plane if the cockpit is compromised. The “pilot” who supposedly flew United 77 into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, had a reputation for being a lousy pilot, incapable of flying a Cessna, let alone a jumbo jet. And yet the maneuvers that were required to turn that plane around are generally regarded by aviators as “impossible.” Even Dan Hanley, an experienced captain, said there was no way he could pull that one off.
Instead, a missile was switched out. What happened to United 77, in that case, is a mystery. The crash site of United 93 in Shanksville was also highly suspicious, as it contained no airplane debris at all. One commentator remarked that it just looked like someone had dropped a bunch of random metal parts out of the sky. So then what happened to United 93? Did they crash it elsewhere? Or land it at a secret military facility and then kill off the passengers? Who knows? Only the CIA and Mossad know.
And then there’s the issue of Building number 7, which came down about 7 hours after the twin towers, and its collapse looks highly suspicious. Not a single engineer or architect believes that a steel frame building could ever collapse from a fire. Its collapse, furthermore, looks too perfect: a pancake collapse in free fall (32 feet per second) that very much resembles the demolition of an unused building.
And the same goes for the trade towers themselves. Most architects do not believe that those two steel frame buildings would collapse (also rather elegantly) from the fire of jet fuel, which burns at about 900 degrees fahrenheit. In order to melt steel, the fire would have had to have been 2800 degrees.
The towers, furthermore, were specifically made to withstand the impact of a plane crash. It seems likely that after the initial plane impacts (which the true perpetrators probably left burning just for the spectacle of it) the buildings were detonated by pre-planted internal explosives. There are many “ear-witnesses” who claim to have heard additional explosions in the buildings unrelated to the plane impacts.
But then why bring down building 7 a few hours later? They were most likely hoping that it would collapse from all the fires. Larry Silverstein, the real estate developer who owned the World Trade Center, was talking to a fire chief and said “better just pull it down.” Which implies that explosives were already planted in the building. These boys knew what they were doing.
But why pull down building 7 at all? Because it was chock full of CIA and FBI offices where records were kept. Destroying the building would erase all records of planning the event.
If the planes were remote controlled (most likely after the initial hi-jacking) then why have hi-jackers at all? Again: for the spectacle of Muslim hi-jackers, which would create a false narrative that the US had been attacked by Saudis.
It all adds up. The CIA in collusion with Mossad creating a false flag event to establish American-Israeli dominance over the Middle East. And war is big business, as Donald Sutherland remarks in JFK.
So now, 25 years later, they are back at it again. Israel has seduced the US into starting a “war of aggression” (which is a war crime under Nuremburg Law) against Iran. But I think Trump has realized that he has made a mistake in listening to morons in his cabinet like Pete Hegseth, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, who promised that a regime change would take no more than 48 hours. But the assassination of Ayatollah Khamenei was a huge mistake, for it galvanized all of Iran to resist the invasion. The Shi’a love their martyrs and now for them, it’s a jihad against the West.
The war is likely to drag on for a very long time, as Iran is one tough motherfucker of a country, and always has been. They survived the Greeks for at least 150 years after the battles at Marathon and Salamis and they will most likely survive the West yet again. Notice that the roles have reversed: now it is Iran which is defending its internal anatomy against a Western invasion. Iran will survive. Israel might not.
Now for the question of Israel: its genocidal behavior in Gaza and its murderous rampage of a temper tantrum in southern Lebanon at Trump’s attempt to broker a two week ceasefire via Pakistan is a complete and TOTAL disgrace. In response to Trump’s attempt, they ramped up bombing campaigns against Lebanese civilians and their infrastructure. Within 24 hours they cruelly murdered 250 people, randomly carpet bombing Beirut.
A friend of mine told me that Israel is the only civilizing force in the Middle East. Well, I guess if your idea of “civilized” consists of putting Palestinian babies in ovens and raping men with metal rods and slicing off the heads of Palestinian children (all true and well reported btw; look it up if you don’t believe me) then I guess you have me beat. I had no idea that was considered “civilized” behavior.
But after this recent genocide in southern Lebanon, the Israelis will be dealing with a reprisal from Hezbollah. Remember what happened in 2006? Hezbollah handed their asses to them.
Then there is Hamas, who are still around after having amazingly survived ceaseless, and ruthless, bombing runs that made Gaza look like the ruins of WWII cities. The 20th century has been characterized as the century “without pity,” but I think the 21st century is on the verge of topping that assessment.
Oh, and let’s not forget the Houthis in Yemen who have joined the war and vowed to hurl missiles Israel’s way.
And of course, there is hi-tech Iran, which has some of the most sophisticated military and technical engineers and scientists in the world. They have massive underground arsenals of cheap but effective drones and expensive hi-tech (and hypersonic) missiles.
If genocide in Lebanon is Netanyahoo’s response to Trump’s attempt at a ceasefire brokered via Pakistan, then I don’t think Israel is EVER going to have a future in the Middle East. Not even with US support. Remember what happened to the US in Afghanistan? After a two decade long forever war, they were literally chased out with their tails between their legs by goat herders.
Wars are temper tantrums, restrictions of consciousness that seek to resolve problems by means of violence. The Zionists of Israel may think that they are “the chosen people,” but they are in reality stuck in spiritual kindergarten.
And Iraq, too, is a story of disaster. The “simple” idea of toppling Sadam Hussein’s regime left a political vacuum and the rise and spread of his rapacious military insurgency. Another forever war that the US lost.
I’m afraid I don’t see a future for Israel. It is the world’s biggest hell hole that hates itself so much that it wants to drag the rest of the world down that hole with it.
Israel needs to go.



I think the 'radical madmen' are real, not 'poor dupes', but they were carefully guided and placed where they were most needed by 'occult forces'. A simple example: Pope Leo dodged the attempt to place a rainbow flag in his hands. By someone who was front row and close to the Pope enough. Pure chance, you say? I think the leftist zealot was authentic, but was placed there to compromise the Pope. The gesture was ignored, but had a scandal erupted, the 'poor' zealot would get all the flak. Forget who placed him there, with millions ready to pay to approach the Pope that close. Last, the entire Israel thing is geopolitical like the issue of the twin countries of yore (Yemen/Germany/Vietnam/Korea etc). Plus, U.S Christian bigots play along because they want eschaton right away.
Hey John, I like your overview and agree about the dynamics. Somethings related to this and your extensive work that's been going through my mind is Mackinder's Heartland Theory and later Rimland Theory. It occurs to me that these struggles over control of the trade routes goes back further than the Trojan War (Rimland - The Hellespont sits right on this boundary, acting as the natural divide between Europe and Asia). Mackinder updates his theory for a modern society but the principle is still the same. A chokepoint that bridges the two halves of the world island together has always been a point of conflict for every empire. Regarding Israel, you know better than I do that people need a story that makes them willing to die - and no story is better than religion. Which is why Israel was put there and supported unconditionally.
So, a Gibbon observation... to the people equally true, to the magistrates equally useful. Whether it's Israel now or Constantine's Dream of a cross, the story serves the purpose of an agenda that contends with limited resources. God subdues Leviathan and it get's used for a purpose. God reminds Job that morality has nothing to do with "deserving". In the end, something must die for life to continue.
Perhaps the hard part for us is that we want to walk away from Omelas because the cost is too great. So there's a lot of real or pretend dissonance. But the truth is, that's life (bare nake Zoë as I've heard you say). God made it that way, which is why Schopenhauer viewed life as fundamentally monstrous.
-Thoughts?